Understanding Shielding Standards

Selecting the Right Protection for Your Location

Introduction

At Allied Shielding, we specialize in providing electromagnetic and radio frequency shielding solutions that meet a variety of rigorous standards. Understanding these standards is crucial for customers and consultants to ensure their locations, be it data centers, command and control rooms, or offices, are adequately protected. This blog post will explain the key standards Allied Shielding is certified to provide, outlining their differences and guiding you on how to choose the right standards for your requirements.

1. MIL-STD-188-125

MIL-STD-188-125 is a standard set by the United States Department of Defense. It specifies requirements for High-Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) protection for ground-based facilities. This standard is crucial for locations that require resilience against high-energy electromagnetic pulses, such as military command and control centers.

2. MIL-STD-285

MIL-STD-285, now superseded by IEEE-STD-299, focused on the measurement of electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding effectiveness. It was a standard for military applications, ensuring that facilities and equipment were shielded from EMI that could disrupt or degrade performance.

3. NSA 65-6

NSA 65-6 is a standard set by the National Security Agency for TEMPEST facilities. It covers the requirements for preventing electronic eavesdropping and interception of classified information. This standard is particularly relevant for locations where sensitive information is handled, such as in government or military data centers.

4. NSA CSS 04-02

NSA CSS 04-02 is another standard from the National Security Agency, focusing on the construction and installation of Secure Rooms and SCIFs (Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities). It is vital for locations that require high-level security measures against electronic surveillance and data breaches.

5. NATO 2345

NATO 2345 is a standard set by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. It provides guidelines for the protection of military assets from electromagnetic threats. This standard is suitable for NATO-related facilities or any location that aligns with NATO’s defense and security protocols.

6. DEF STAN 59-188

DEF STAN 59-188 is a standard issued by the UK Ministry of Defence. It specifies requirements for shielding materials and performance to protect against electromagnetic threats. This standard is critical for UK defense-related infrastructures or any facilities that adhere to UK defense protocols.

7. STD 299

STD 299 (IEEE-STD-299) is the standard that replaced MIL-STD-285. It provides a universal methodology for measuring the effectiveness of electromagnetic shielding. This standard is applicable across various industries and is essential for ensuring that any facility meets the required shielding effectiveness.

Choosing the Right Standard

Selecting the right standard depends on several factors:

  • Type of Facility: Data centers might prioritize NSA standards for information security, while military installations might require MIL-STD or NATO standards.

  • Geographical Location: Facilities in the UK may prefer DEF STAN 59-188, whereas US facilities might lean towards MIL-STD or NSA standards.

  • Nature of Threats: Different standards cater to different threat levels. For instance, HEMP protection requires adherence to MIL-STD-188-125.

  • Regulatory Requirements: Depending on the industry and government regulations, certain standards might be mandatory.

Conclusion

Understanding and choosing the right electromagnetic and radio frequency shielding standards is critical for the security and functionality of your facility. Allied Shielding’s expertise in these standards ensures that your location is equipped with the most appropriate and effective shielding solutions. For more detailed information and assistance in selecting the right standard for your facility, reach out to our team of experts.

Previous
Previous

Designing Shielded Spaces

Next
Next

Exploring Shielding Materials